Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]

[Jonathan Sambrook]

At 00:17 on Tue 23/03/04, pavel@xxxxxx masquerading as 'Pavel Machek' wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > Now I have _proof_ that eye-candy is harmfull. What is see on screen is:
> > 
> > No, that's not proof; just a bug in the code. It's not using the right
> > code to display the error message. I'll fix it asap.
> 
> :-)
> 
> I'd really like eye-candy code to be gone. Its long, and its not worth
> the trouble.

Pejorative comments aside Pavel, it is valued feedback for end-user
re-assurance. It has also helped swsusp2 get streets ahead of the other
implementations by aiding end-user feedback on a wide range of hardware,
Which would appear to be well worth it? If it's not broke (and is
valuble) why rip it out?

Regards,
Jonathan


-- 


    .__
    |..|__   _____   _____   ___        ____  _    ____
    |;;|: \ /;:;:;\ /;:;:;\ /;:;\      /;;;;\/;\/\/;;;;\
    |   Y  \  Y Y  \  Y Y  \  Y  \    |  ___ \ |\_| ___ \
    |___|  /__|_|  /__|_|  /__|  /  o  \_____/ |  \___  /
         \/      \/      \/    \/            \/    _/  /
                                                   \__/
 
 hmmnsoft's FreeShade : window shading, for Windows, for free
 
                http://www.hmmn.org/FreeShade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/