Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 1/6 objrmap

[Martin J. Bligh]

> I'm working on my code yes, I think my code is finished, I prefer my
> design for the various reasons explained in the other emails (you don't
> swap so you can't appreciate the benefits, you only have to check that
> performs as well as Hugh's code).
> 
> Hugh's and your code is unstable in objrmap, you can find the details in
> the email I sent to Hugh, mine is stable (running such simulation for a
> few days just fine on 4-way xeon, without my objrmap fixes it live locks
> as soon as it hits swap).
> 
> You find my anon_vma in 2.6.5-rc1aa2, it's rock solid, just apply the
> whole patch and compare it with your other below results. thanks.

Mmmm, if you have a broken out patch, it'd be preferable. If I were to 
apply the whole of -mjb, I'll get a damned sight better results than 
any of them, but that's not really a fair comparison ;-) I'll can at 
least check it's stable for me that way though. 

I did find your broken-out anon-vma patch, but it's against something
else, maybe half-way up your tree or something, and I didn't bother
trying to fix it ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/