Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:51:11AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I may have missed one of his posts where he gave the results from the
>> RT test suite. I found a list of functions with some kind of numbers,
>> though I didn't see a description of what those numbers were and was
>> looking for something more detailed (e.g. the output of the RT
>> instrumentation things he had with and without preempt). This is all
>> mostly curiosity and sort of hoping this gets carried out vaguely
>> scientifically anyway, so I'm not really arguing one way or the other.

On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:03:11PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> agreed. what I've seen so far is a great number of graphs, they were
> scientific enough for my needs and covering real life different
> workloads, but I'm not sure what Takashi published exactly, you may want
> to discuss it with him.

I didn't see the graphs; they may be helpful for my purposes.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/