Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1

[Prakash K. Cheemplavam]

Ross Dickson wrote:
> On Saturday 20 March 2004 19:29, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>
> > Len Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power:
> > > > active state:            C1
> > > > default state:           C1
> > > > bus master activity:     00000000
> > > > states:
> > > >   *C1:                  promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000] 
> > > > usage[00000000]
> > > >    C2:                  <not supported>
> > > >    C3:                  <not supported>
> > > >
> > > > I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla 
> > > > 2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having 
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage.
> >
> > Hmm, OK, then I am really puzzled what specifically about mm sources 
> > make my idle temps hotter, as I still couldn't properly resolve it what 
> > is causing it. I thought ACPI, but no, using APM only does the same (apm 
> > only with vanilla is low temp though.)
>
>
> Have you seen this thread, it may be relevant?
> Re: [2.6.4-rc2] bogus semicolon behind if()
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2004-03/4170.html

Hi Ross, I don't think so, as I currently don't use APIC and thus fix in 
above post wouldn't help me. Or should I read further?

cya,

Prakash

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/