Re: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7]

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:23:10PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> My hero! :)  I think this has been needed for awhile, but now that I
> think about it, it begs the question of what a node is.  Is it a set
> of CPUs and blocks of memory (that seems to be the most commonly used
> definition in the code), just memory, just CPUs, or what?  On sn2
> hardware, we have the concept of a node without CPUs.  And due to our
> wacky I/O layout, we also have nodes without CPUs *or* memory!  (The
> I/O guys call these "ionodes".)  And then of course, there are CPUs
> that aren't particularly close to any memory (i.e. they have none of
> their own, and have to go several hops and/or through other CPUs to
> get at memory at all).
> I'll take a look at the ia64 bits when I get them (I've only received
> two of the seven patches thus far).

You need a tripartite graph.
(a) are connections full or half duplex? (i.e. directed or undirected)
(b) do you need distinct weights on each edge? (i.e. weighted or unweighted)


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/