Re: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2

From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:07:26 EST


On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:58:20AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > --- sles-objrmap/mm/rmap.c.~1~ 2004-03-03 06:45:38.995594456 +0100
> > +++ sles-objrmap/mm/rmap.c 2004-03-03 07:01:39.200621104 +0100
> > @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ try_to_unmap_obj_one(struct vm_area_stru
> > if (!pte)
> > goto out;
> >
> > - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> > + if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED|VM_RESERVED)) {
> > ret = SWAP_FAIL;
> > goto out_unmap;
>
> I keep on wanting to put that in there too. But pages in a VM_RESERVED vma
> should not find their way onto the LRU. Maybe we should be checking for
> that in do_no_page().

you're right, so we can turn this into a BUG_ON, I prefer it here, since
this is really the place that VM_RESERVED is mean to guard against (plus
the vma merging).

thanks for the explanation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/