Re: Code freeze on lite patches and schedule for submission into mainline kernel

[Pavel Machek]

> > > We have two sets of kgdb patches as of now: [core-lite, i386-lite, 8250]
> > > and [core, i386, ppc, x86_64, eth]. First set of kgdb patches (lite) is
> > > fairly clean. Let's consider it to be a candicate for submission to
> > > mainline kernel.
> >
> > There may be better way to get kgdb into mainline.
> >
> > AFAICS, mainline already contains kgdb/ppc. Submiting "core-lite,
> > ppc-lite, 8250" would then be simply much needed cleanup. We can push
> > i386 few days after that.
> 
> ppc.patch removes arch/ppc/kernel/ppc-stub.c and adds a new file kgdb.c I 
> think that has a greater rejection chance.
> 
> Let's not change the direction now. Some time ago there was another view that 
> x86_64 would be easier. We have already had sufficient headache because of 
> split -lite -heavy patches. Let's try to finish that asap.

Okay, you are right. i386 is best tested.
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/