Re: poll() in 2.6 and beyond

[Roland Dreier]

    Bill> Could you maybe go back to the initial report, which is that
    Bill> after poll() gets wrong status? It's nice to argue about
    Bill> where the process waits, but the issue is if it gets the
    Bill> same status with 2.4 and 2.6, and if not which one should be
    Bill> fixed.

I'm sure the problem is a buggy driver.  The original question
represents a complete misunderstanding of how poll() is implemented,
so it's no surprise that the driver breaks.

 - Roland



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/