Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:02:16PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:

> Tom Rini wrote:
> >Hello.  The following interdiff kills kgdb_serial in favor of function
> >names.  This only adds a weak function for kgdb_flush_io, and documents
> >when it would need to be provided.
> 
> It looks like you are also dumping any notion of building a kernel that can 
> choose which method of communication to use for kgdb at run time.  Is this 
> so?

Yes, as this is how Andrew suggested we do it.  It becomes quite ugly if
you try and allow for any 2 of 3 methods.

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/