Re: [SELINUX] Handle fuse binary mount data.

[James Morris]

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Urban Widmark wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, James Morris wrote:
> 
> > It seems more like a property of the filesystem type: perhaps add 
> > FS_BINARY_MOUNTDATA to fs_flags for such filesystems, per the patch below.
> ...
> > diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.6.3-mm4.o/fs/smbfs/inode.c linux-2.6.3-mm4.w/fs/smbfs/inode.c
> > --- linux-2.6.3-mm4.o/fs/smbfs/inode.c	2003-10-15 08:53:19.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.3-mm4.w/fs/smbfs/inode.c	2004-02-29 19:50:58.172037088 -0500
> > @@ -778,6 +778,7 @@
> >  	.name		= "smbfs",
> >  	.get_sb		= smb_get_sb,
> >  	.kill_sb	= kill_anon_super,
> > +	.fs_flags	= FS_BINARY_MOUNTDATA,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int __init init_smb_fs(void)
> 
> smbfs does not have a binary mountdata, unless the smbmount used is really
> old (samba 2.0). If that means that it should get a FS_BINARY_MOUNTDATA
> flag or not, I don't know.

Well, smb_fill_super() looks like it is dealing with binary mount data 
initially, and we need to treat it as such.  This should be fixed properly 
so that different versions of smbfs have different filesystem types, like 
NFS.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/