Re: [PATCH] [APM] Is this the correct way to fix suspend bug introduced in 2.6.0-test4?

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!
> 
> the patch below (against 2.6.1-mm5) fixes my APM problems (my laptop, Acer
> TravelMate 210TEV (Celeron 700, 128 MB RAM), hangs after resuming from APM
> since 2.6.0-test4).
> 
> I found the "fix" by trying to "reversely" backport the changes from
> patch-2.6.0-test4.bz2 into 2.6.1-mm5 (the old device_suspend code calls
> sysdev_suspend, the new one does not; so what do I lose if I call
> sysdev_suspend myself?). This trial-and-error-approach finally led into the
> patch below (which works great for me).
> 
> Most likely this is not the cleanest way to do this; but since I don't even
> know what this sysdev_suspend does (except that it does something that
> seems to be vital for making my laptop resume...), i don't know how to make
> it better...
> 
> If you have any suggestions, tell me (or change it yourself and submit it),
> if you think that's okay like that, please submit that to the guy who is
> responsible for 2.6 (is it Linus or Andrew? did not follow lkml
> recently).

Andrew.

I think you should use device_power_down() and device_power_up(),
instead. Check it, but it looks to me like that's better way.
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/