Races in sleep_on()

From: David Woodhouse
Date: Thu Jan 22 2004 - 07:59:03 EST


On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 00:54 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Yes. That's why I advocated the BUG_ON(!BKL) a _long_ time ago. Arjan
> > had a huge list of bogus callers even in 2.4.
>
> So... do me a patch which does a WARN_ON()? Make sure that it shuts
> itself up after the first five messages so people don't hate us too much.
>
> To get best coverage you'll need to make the !CONFIG_SMP&&!CONFIG_PREEMPT
> version of lock_kernel() set a flag or something.

Since the spinlock is a NOP anyway there doesn't seem to be any harm in
just letting the UP version use the same code as the SMP/PREEMPT
versions.

I've done the _timeout versions too, despite the frequent whinge that
'it's OK if we miss wakeups because we time out eventually anyway'. That
argument was never acceptable to me anyway.

===== include/linux/smp_lock.h 1.7 vs edited =====
--- 1.7/include/linux/smp_lock.h Mon Jan 19 23:38:11 2004
+++ edited/include/linux/smp_lock.h Thu Jan 22 09:15:17 2004
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>

-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
+#define BKL_DEBUG /* For testing for sleep_on() abuse */
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) || defined(BKL_DEBUG)

extern spinlock_t kernel_flag;

===== kernel/sched.c 1.236 vs edited =====
--- 1.236/kernel/sched.c Mon Jan 19 23:38:12 2004
+++ edited/kernel/sched.c Thu Jan 22 10:49:55 2004
@@ -1903,10 +1903,21 @@
__remove_wait_queue(q, &wait); \
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);

+#define SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK \
+ if (unlikely(!kernel_locked()) && \
+ sleep_on_bkl_warnings < 10) { \
+ sleep_on_bkl_warnings++; \
+ WARN_ON(1); \
+ }
+
+static int sleep_on_bkl_warnings;
+
void interruptible_sleep_on(wait_queue_head_t *q)
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR

+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
+
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;

SLEEP_ON_HEAD
@@ -1920,6 +1931,8 @@
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR

+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
+
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;

SLEEP_ON_HEAD
@@ -1935,6 +1948,8 @@
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR

+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK
+
current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;

SLEEP_ON_HEAD
@@ -1947,6 +1962,8 @@
long sleep_on_timeout(wait_queue_head_t *q, long timeout)
{
SLEEP_ON_VAR
+
+ SLEEP_ON_BKLCHECK

current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;



--
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/