Re: [RFC] kill sleep_on

[Arjan van de Ven]

> Any objections against killing it entirely? Or what about marking it as
> deprecated, as the first step towards killing it?

I have it marked like that in my tree. Lots of warnings... and
unfortionately about half are in "new" code so imo we can't mark it
deprecated early enough to prevent more of these bugs to enter the
kernel.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part