Re: [PATCH 2.6] Altix updates

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:54:37PM -0600, Pat Gefre wrote:
> 001-reorg.patch
> 002-reorg1.patch

The IS_IOADDR() stuff in the accesor funcs in pcibr_reg.c is completly
bogus, please decide whether you want to pass a pointer to the pcibr_soft
or bridge_t to it instead of doing second-guessing.

Also while the pic.h changes look okay they will conflict with a patch
I'm about to send that adds common headers for the bridge/xbow/xwidget
register for mips and IA64.  Can you send me a version of pic.h with
those changes and the big endian ifdefs back in so I can just incorporate
the new version into my patch?

Also are all those access you abstract away different in TIOCP?  If not
please don't add the wrappers for them.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/