Re: Proposed enhancements to MD

[Wakko Warner]

> > As I've understood it, the configuration for DM is userspace and the kernel
> > can't do any auto detection.  This would be a "put off" for me to use as a
> > root filesystem.  Configurations like this (and lvm too last I looked at it)
> > require an initrd or some other way of setting up the device.  Unfortunately
> > this means that there's configs in 2 locations (one not easily available,  if
> > using initrd.  easily != mounting via loop!)
> 
> You can always do the following: use a mini root fs on the partition 
> where the kernel is located that does nothing but vgscan and friends and 
> then calls pivot_root. '/sbin/init' of the mini root fs looks like:

What is the advantage of not putting the autodetector/setup in the kernel? 
Not everyone is going to use this software (or am I wrong on that?) so that
can be left as an option to compile in (or as a module if possible and if
autodetection is not required).  How much work is it to maintain something
like this in the kernel?

I ask because I'm not a kernel hacker, mostly an end user  (atleast I can
compile my own kernels =)

I must say, the day that kernel level ip configuration via bootp is removed
I'm going to be pissed =)

I like the fact that MD can autodetect raids on boot when compiled in, I
didn't like the fact it can't be partitioned.  That's the only thing that
put me off with MD.  LVM put me off because it couldn't be auto detected at
boot.  I was going to play with DM, but I haven't yet.

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/