Re: [PATCH(s)][RFC] variable size and signedness issues in ldt.c -potential problem?

[Jesper Juhl]

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:20:23 +0100 (CET) Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> |
> | On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> |
> | > Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx> wrote:
> | > >
> | > > After creating the initial cleanup patch I've noticed several more
> | > > instances of this 'bad style'. If there's any interrest in cleaning them
> | > > up I'll be happy to create a patch.  Is this wanted?
> | >
> | > I'd say that this and the whitespace adjustments are far too trivial to be
> | > raising patches at this time.
> | >
> | You are right, it /is/ trivial - I'll leave it alone for now.  Maybe later
> | create a patch that does a more thorough cleanup and send it to the
> | trivial patch monkey.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Or I can put it into the KJ patchset and just never send it onward.
> That will at least get it some usage time.
>
> BTW, if you want to stick with trivial_Rusty, that's OK with me too.
> Rusty does a fine job and I'm not trying to compete with him.
>

How about I create the patch (in a few days, I'm a little short on time),
then send it to Rusty's trivial and CC you ?
Then you can do with it what you please.


-- Jesper Juhl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/