Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanitychecking

From: Xavier Bestel
Date: Fri Jan 09 2004 - 19:30:59 EST


Le ven 09/01/2004 à 21:41, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:20:53PM +0100, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote:
> > I think this points to an 'issue', if we're going to increase the checks
> > in the ELF-loader (and thus increase the size of the minimal valid ELF
> > file we can load, thus effectively 'bloating' (lol) some programs) we
> > should probably allow some sort of direct binary executable files [i.e.
> > header 'XBIN386\0' followed by Read/Execute binary code to execute by
>
> Like binfmt_flat? :)

.. or even zflat. Not that I'm proud of it, but it can effectively
manage to produce rather compact executables :)

Xav

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/