Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.0-test10-mm1] dio-read-race-fix

From: Daniel McNeil
Date: Thu Jan 08 2004 - 18:58:37 EST


On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 22:09, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:

> Since the first filemap_write_and_wait call is redundant and somewhat
> suspect since its called w/o i_sem (I can think of unexpected side effects
> on parallel filemap_write_and_wait calls), have you thought of disabling that
> and then trying to see if you can still recreate the problem ? It may
> not make a difference, but it seems like the right thing to do and could
> at least simplify some of the debugging.
>
> Regards
> Suparna
>


Ok, I retried my test without the filemap_write_and_wait() that is not
protected by i_sem and the test still sees uninitialized data. I'm
still running with test10-mm1 + all the patches I sent out before.
I'm haven't tried 2.6.0-rc*-mm1 yet. I need to move all my debug code
over to the latest mm kernel. I also did not want to change too much
at same time.

Daniel



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/