Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6

[Dave Jones]

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:33:08AM -0500, Rob Love wrote:

 > Yah.  I was just answering in the abstract to the "does cache line
 > matter on non-SMP" question.
 > 
 > I actually like this patch (perhaps since I have a P-M :) and think it
 > ought to go in, although I agree with others that the P-M is more of a
 > super-P3 than a scaled down P4.

FWIW, I agree with it too on the grounds that its non obvious the optimal
setting is CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII. This seems cleaner IMO than changing the
helptext to read...

 "Pentium II"
 "Pentium III / Pentium 4M"
 "Pentium 4"

My other mail may have sounded like I objected to the patch per se, I don't.

		Dave

-- 
 Dave Jones     http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/