Is Rational rational?

[Thomas Molina]

Does the enclosed patch to fs/namei.c make sense?

IBM/Rational Software is advocating use of the following patch to deal 
with a situation where users of Clearcase are having difficulties deleting 
sockets, devices, and named pipes when using the mvfs file system.  The 
problem reportedly arises from populating a shadow filesystem with the 
contents of the system root and the handling of sockets, devices and named 
pipes.  The full text of the problem report response can be accessed by 
going to:

http://www.ibm.com/software/rational/support/

and entering 1154790 in the search box.


--- /usr/src/linux/fs/namei.c Tue Oct 30 10:03:52 2001
+++ /usr/src/linux-patched/namei.c Fri Jun 20 05:12:16 2003
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@
static inline int may_delete(struct inode *dir,struct dentry *victim, int isdir)
{
int error;
- if (!victim->d_inode || victim->d_parent->d_inode != dir)
+ if (!victim->d_inode)
return -ENOENT;
error = permission(dir,MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC);
if (error)

I'm not really competent to evaluate this proposesd patch, but it 
certainly makes me nervous.  Their comment on this also bothers me: 
"Rational Software believes that the check that is removed by this patch
is one that should never fail for any properly operating filesystem. "
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/