Re: Scheduler degradation since 2.5.66

[Jamie Lokier]

George Anzinger wrote:
> Try running the test with a requested sleep time of something less than 
> 0.999849 ms.  All this is for the x86 which is using this time to do the 
> best it can with the PIT which can only get this close to 1 ms ticks.  You 
> can even vary this number to see exactly where the round up actually 
> happens.  Ah, life in the nano world :)

Would it be better to program the PIT for lowest frequency that's >= 1.0ms.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/