Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper

From: Keith Owens
Date: Sun Dec 14 2003 - 18:06:57 EST


On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:21:56 -0800,
Larry McVoy <lm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I've prototyped an extension to BitKeeper that provides tarballs
>and patches. ...
>... You need to understand that this is all you get,
>we're not going to extend this so you can do anything but track the most
>recent sources accurately. No diffs. No getting anything but the most
>recent version. No revision history.

Do we get the changelogs from each BK check in? Without the
changelogs, patches are going to be much less useful.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/