Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree

[Pavel Machek]

HI!

> That's a bit rough, isn't it Pavel? I fully agree that the power
> management support in 2.4 is incomplete (just as is the case in 2.6),
> but there is power management support in 2.4, and it is being used.

Okay, I was a bit rough. Anyway pm support in 2.4 can not be made
complete by simply fixing all the drivers (unlike 2.6). I know that it
can be made to work pretty well for a lot of user, but I still do not
think that makes it suitable for 2.4 merge.
								Pavel

> Regards,
> 
> Nigel
> 
> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.
> > 
> > 2.4 has no driver model => swsusp for 2.4 is a hack. Its nice and
> > working, but it is still a hack.
> > 							Pavel

-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/