I have an nForce2 w/ Radeon 9000. No problems w/ DRI drivers (included"Marcelo" == Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Marcelo> 2.6 is already stable enough for people to use it.
Yes, that's an old post I'm responding to, but I've just given 2.6 a try
on my desktop machine, and the above statement seems even more
annoying. I hit the following problems:
-- I had to wrestle ATI drivers into compiling, they finally did, but
the kernel prints scary-looking warnings with call stacks, about
"sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:1856,
-- modules don't autoload for some reason (though I'm sure that couldMake sure you have all the different module options turned on. In 2.6
be solved),
-- bttv does not compile, so no video input for me,I don't know anything about video input. Did you try Google?
-- drivers for my telephony card (from Digium) are not 2.6-ready, soI don't know anything about telephony. Did you try Google?
no telephony support for me,
-- I have just frozen the machine hard by copying files over NFS andWhat CPU/chipset do you have? There are timing issues with nForce2
doing a simulation write to an ATAPI CD-RW at the same time.
VMWare won't work (according to the VMWare tech support people), but
I haven't even gotten to VMware and user-mode Linux, which I also need,
and I'm not even dreaming about getting my scanner to work. Not to
mention that on my laptop there would be an entirely different set of
issues, and software suspend in 2.6 is, well, still lacking.
But there is plenty of improvement for plenty of people.
So, as for me, 2.6 is a definite no-no. I see no advantage whatsoever in
running it, it caused me nothing but pain, and there is no improvement
that I could see that would justify the upgrade.
I doubt I have the same hardware as the main developers, but I did
So please be careful when making statements like that. 2.6 is *NOT*
stable enough nor ready enough for people to use it, unless those people
have a narrow range of hardware on which the 2.6 kernel has actually
been tested (translation: they have the same hardware as the main
developers do).
--J.
Attachment:
pgp00001.pgp
Description: PGP signature