Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thu Dec 11 2003 - 10:19:34 EST




Rhino wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:14:45 +1100
Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


You won't be able to merge mine with Ingo's. Which one put the box on
steroids? :)


sorry if i wasn't clearly enough, but i merged each one of them separately on top of a wli-2. that comment was for the wli changes. :)


Wonder whats going on here? Is this my patch vs Ingo's with nothing else applied?
How does plain 2.6.0-test11 go?

Thanks for testing.



ok, this time on a plain test11.


I mean, what results does test11 get when running the benchmarks.


hackbench:

w26 sched-SMT-C1

50 5.026 50 5.182
100 10.062 100 10.602
150 15.906 150 16.214


time tar -xvjpf linux-2.6.0-test11.tar.bz2:

w26 sched-SMT-C1

real 0m21.835s real 0m21.827s
user 0m20.274s user 0m20.412s
sys 0m4.178s sys 0m4.260s

^^^^^^^^
OK I guess the real 43s in your last set of results was a typo.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/