Re: [BUG 2.6.0-test11] pcnet32 oops

[Rask Ingemann Lambertsen]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:59:00PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> This is the classic case of doing disabling/enabling of software
> interrupts with hardware interrupts disabled, which is a bug.
> 
> In this case pcnet32_set_multicast_list() is disabling hardware
> interrupts, and the packet freeing of pcnet32_purge_tx_ring()
> is what leads to the software interrupt disable/enable.

I think the root cause of this problem is that pcnet32_set_multicast_list()
dumps the entire TX ring on the floor (as a side effect of calling
pcnet32_restart()). I don't think dev->set_multicast_list() is supposed to
do that.

> However, I'm inclined to believe that we should change dev_kfree_skb_any()
> to fix this class of problems, by making it check for hardware interrupts
> being disabled as well as being in an interrupt.

I've been wondering about this too with the recent netpoll patches. Many
(including pcnet32) implement the poll controller simply as

	disable_irq (dev->irq);
	driver_interrupt_handler (dev->irq, dev, NULL);
	enable_irq (dev->irq);

If the interrupt handler calls dev_kfree_skb_any(), could you then run into
this kind of problem? Or is it just if you call spin_lock_irq*() that you
have a problem?

-- 
Regards,
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/