Re: question about preempt_disable()

From: Matthias Urlichs
Date: Mon Dec 08 2003 - 11:42:46 EST


Hi,

Rob Love wrote:
> Further, on uniprocessor systems, we don't have deadlocks so it is the
> preempt_disable() that actually ensures concurrency is prevented in the
> critical region.
>
We don't have _spin_locks.

--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@xxxxxxxxxx
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.debian.net
- -
I don't care how poor and inefficient a country is; they like to run their
own business. I know men that would make my wife a better husband than I am;
but, darn it, I'm not going to give her to 'em.
-- Will Rogers

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/