Re: [2.6 RFC/PATCH] Input: possible deadlock in i8042

From: Vojtech Pavlik
Date: Sun Nov 30 2003 - 04:01:56 EST


On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:03:57AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> If request_irq fails in i8042_open it will call serio_unregister_port,
> which takes serio_sem. i8042_open may be called:
>
> serio_register_port - serio_find_dev - dev->connect
> serio_register_device - dev->connect
>
> Both serio_register_port and serio_register_device take serio_sem as well.
>
> I think that serio_{register|unregister}_port can be converted into
> submitting requests to kseriod thus removing deadlock on the serio_sem.
>
> The patch below is on top of serio* patches in Andrew Morton's -mm tree.

It's nice to avoid the deadlock this way, but I think it's not a good
idea to make the register/unregister asynchronous - it could be a nasty
surprise for an unsuspecting driver writer.

> Dmitry
>
> ===================================================================
>
>
> ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2003-11-30 02:42:54-05:00, dtor_core@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Input: Use kseriod to register/unregister serio ports
>
>
> serio.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> ===================================================================
>
> diff -Nru a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/serio.c Sun Nov 30 03:01:40 2003
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/serio.c Sun Nov 30 03:01:40 2003
> @@ -83,8 +83,10 @@
> }
> }
>
> -#define SERIO_RESCAN 1
> -#define SERIO_RECONNECT 2
> +#define SERIO_RESCAN 1
> +#define SERIO_RECONNECT 2
> +#define SERIO_REGISTER_PORT 3
> +#define SERIO_UNREGISTER_PORT 4
>
> static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(serio_wait);
> static DECLARE_COMPLETION(serio_exited);
> @@ -111,6 +113,14 @@
> goto event_done;
>
> switch (event->type) {
> + case SERIO_REGISTER_PORT :
> + __serio_register_port(event->serio);
> + break;
> +
> + case SERIO_UNREGISTER_PORT :
> + __serio_unregister_port(event->serio);
> + break;
> +
> case SERIO_RECONNECT :
> if (event->serio->dev && event->serio->dev->reconnect)
> if (event->serio->dev->reconnect(event->serio) == 0)
> @@ -192,9 +202,7 @@
>
> void serio_register_port(struct serio *serio)
> {
> - down(&serio_sem);
> - __serio_register_port(serio);
> - up(&serio_sem);
> + serio_queue_event(serio, SERIO_REGISTER_PORT);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -210,9 +218,7 @@
>
> void serio_unregister_port(struct serio *serio)
> {
> - down(&serio_sem);
> - __serio_unregister_port(serio);
> - up(&serio_sem);
> + serio_queue_event(serio, SERIO_UNREGISTER_PORT);
> }
>
> /*
>

--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/