Re: 2.4.20-18 size-4096 memory leaks

[Stephen C. Tweedie]

Hi,

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:57, Jean Delvare wrote:

> I just wanted to let you know that I have been experiencing similar
> leaks. So far, I wasn't enable to find where the leak was, but your
> theory matches my observations:
> 
> 1* On two systems running 2.4.20-2.4.22 kernels, I observed that the
> free memory as reported by top was going down regularly, by blocks of 4
> or 8kB at an average rate of 90kB/min. Sometimes the value would
> stabilize, but I couldn't understand why. What was lost as "free"
> memory
> increased "buffers" from the same amount.

That's not a leak, it simply sounds like cache effects.  atime updates
result in journal commits under ext3, and those use at least a couple of
buffers at a time (one for the metadata descriptor block in the journal,
one for the journal commit.)  Those aren't leaks --- they are temporary
use of cache, and once the IO has complete the memory can be immediately
reclaimed by the kernel if it is needed for anything else.

Cheers, 
 Stephen


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/