Re: hash table sizes

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:07:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> the size of these tables dependent upon the number of dentries/inodes/etc
> which the system is likely to support.  And that does depend upon the
> amount of direct-addressible memory.
> 
> 
> So hum.  As a starting point, what happens if we do:
> 
> -	vfs_caches_init(num_physpages);
> +	vfs_caches_init(min(num_physpages, pages_in_ZONE_NORMAL));
> 
> ?

Something like that might be ok, but on our system, all memory is in
ZONE_DMA...

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/