Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm4

From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 05:52:00 EST


On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:34:19AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> The following, incremental atop the smp_local_irq_*() removal, turns
> shrink_pagetable_cache() into a set_shrinker()-registered shrinker_t.
> I'm not entirely sure how good an idea this is given my prior remarks
> about the vmscan.c code skipping shrink_slab() under highmem pressure.
> Maybe the proper solution is teaching true slab shrinkers to honor
> the gfp_mask argument?
> This is also untested (apart from compiletesting).

If any of this goes anywhere, I probably deserve a wee bit of credit
for getting it done (well, I did put some time into it). Here's me
patting myself on the back, incremental atop the previous two.


-- wli



diff -prauN mm4-2.6.0-test9-4/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c mm4-2.6.0-test9-5/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c
--- mm4-2.6.0-test9-4/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2003-11-19 02:26:04.000000000 -0800
+++ mm4-2.6.0-test9-5/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2003-11-19 02:46:50.000000000 -0800
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
/*
* linux/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c
+ * highpte-compatible pte cacheing, William Irwin, IBM, June 2003
*/

#include <linux/config.h>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/