Re: Linux 2.4.23-pre8

[Trond Myklebust]

>>>>> " " == Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx> writes:

     > Did you patch your source with
     > ea+acl+nfsacl-2.4.22-0.8.63.diff.gz?  vanilla -pre8 looks fine,
     > however a strikingly similar hunk is in the ea+acl+nfsacl
     > patch:


     > It looks safe to just nuke this hunk from the acl patch.

Indeed. It would appear to be quite incorrect to return ENOSYS in this
case, since glibc tends to interpret that as meaning that an actual
syscall is not implemented.

     > NB: Always test a clean kernel tree ;-)

Right... Or else report bugs to the maintainers of the patches you
have applied rather than to me.

Cheers,
  Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/