Re: 2.6.0-test8: cpufreq longhaul probs..still :-(

[Dave Jones]

On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:16:21PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:

 > With test8 there are still problems with the longhaul cpufreq stuff:
 > 
 > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v1 supported.
 > longhaul: MinMult=3.0x MaxMult=6.0x
 > longhaul: FSB: 0MHz Lowestspeed=0MHz Highestspeed=0MHz

*boggle*, we had these fixed I thought..

I'm going to need you to litter the code with printk's to find out
why your MSRs are returning zeros. Contact me off list if you want
a patch to do this, otherwise.. don't be afraid to go overboard,
the more debug info the better.

 > I'll check if I can fix the min/max freq. Is Longhaul v1 correct for
 > this CPU? With cpufreq from 2.4 it always displays v2.

According to the documentation, yes.

		Dave


-- 
 Dave Jones     http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/