Re: Transparent compression in the FS

From: Robert Love
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 13:34:00 EST


On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 14:28, John Bradford wrote:

> Surely it's just common sense to say that you have to verify the whole
> block - any algorithm that can compress N values into <N values is
> lossy by definition. A mathematical proof for that is easy.

That is the problem.

But those pushing this approach argue that the chance of collision is
less than the chance of hardware errors, et cetera.

Read Val's paper. It is interesting.

Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/