Re: [PATCH] Fix mlockall for PROT_NONE mappings

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Oct 09 2003 - 06:31:47 EST


> I agree that improved readability is not "essential". Do you agree
> that it's preferable?

I don't think this version is particularly unreadable or that your
change would improve it very much.
(to make any sense of a function with 6+ arguments you have to look
at the function definition, no way around that, and there is a comment
that explains it there), so I don't think the change is particularly
important.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/