Re: Can't X be elemenated?

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 14:17:59 EST


Hi!

> > > And yet.. there are times when I need something VERY light weight, and
> > > globally portable. So I started my own for a specific application
> > > where
> >
> > Well, in one of previous mails I said that "one per goal" is the right
> > thing. So it is okay for "small" toolkits to exists, but I do not like
> > qt vs. gtk, because they have identical goals.
> >
> > Anyway, this is off-topic for linux-kernel, and I guess we should end
> > here.
>
> *BSD and Linux have the same goals (at least as close as GTK and QT do),
> does this mean that Linus should not have started writing Linux?

I'm not saying that work on GTK or QT should not have started. I
understand why they did. Still its a pity.

Anyway Linux vs. FreeBSD is completely another situation, because
Linux is clearly dominant. I have no problem with that. But GTK vs. QT
have roughly equivalent usage... Thats bad.
Pavel

--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/