Re: POSIX message queues
From: Peter Waechtler
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 02:51:46 EST
On Sunday, October 05, 2003, at 08:32PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Speaking of librt - I should not have to link in pthreads and the
>> run-time overhead associated with it (locking stdio etc.) just so I
>> can use shm_open(). Any chance of fixing this?
>
>That overhead is mostly gone in current glibcs (when using NPTL):
>a) e.g. locking is done unconditionally even when libpthread is not present
> (it is just lock cmpxchgl, inlined)
a "lock cmpxchg" is > 100 cycles (according to a recent Linux Journal article
from Paul McKenney: 107ns on 700MHz PentiumIII)
But I think you will have benchmarked the alternatives?
BTW, what are they?
you suggested naming the syscall number symbols NR_mq_open instead of
NR_sys_mq_open. In the stub I want to overload some syscalls (e.g. mq_open)
but others not (e.g. mq_timedsend).
How to deal with that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/