[TRIVIAL] [2.6 PATCH] hlist constification

From: Rusty Trivial Russell
Date: Sun Oct 05 2003 - 02:22:31 EST


From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>

I posted a patch to consify 3 inline functions in <linux/list.h> to lkml
on 9/1 but it looks like it slipped through the cracks. Looking at your
trivial tree it seems that Inaky Perez-Gonzalez already submitted a patch
to constify list_empty(). Here is a patch to do the other two. Should
be non-controversial.

Patch is versus your current 2.6.0-test5-bk2 trivial tree.

-Mitch


--- trivial-2.6.0-test6-bk6/include/linux/list.h.orig 2003-10-05 16:50:48.000000000 +1000
+++ trivial-2.6.0-test6-bk6/include/linux/list.h 2003-10-05 16:50:48.000000000 +1000
@@ -421,12 +421,12 @@
#define INIT_HLIST_HEAD(ptr) ((ptr)->first = NULL)
#define INIT_HLIST_NODE(ptr) ((ptr)->next = NULL, (ptr)->pprev = NULL)

-static __inline__ int hlist_unhashed(struct hlist_node *h)
+static __inline__ int hlist_unhashed(const struct hlist_node *h)
{
return !h->pprev;
}

-static __inline__ int hlist_empty(struct hlist_head *h)
+static __inline__ int hlist_empty(const struct hlist_head *h)
{
return !h->first;
}
--
What is this? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/trivial/
Don't blame me: the Monkey is driving
File: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>: [2.6 PATCH] hlist constification
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/