RE: down_timeout

From: Grover, Andrew
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 13:06:49 EST


> From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Wilcox
> It's still not great because it doesn't preserve ordering.
> down_timeout()
> would be a much better primitive. We have down_interruptible() which
> could be used for this purpose. Something like (completely
> uncompiled):

Yeah we proposed this 2 years ago and someone (don't remember who) shot
us down.

Regards -- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/