Re: must-fix list reconciliation

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:19:51PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> As you might or might not know, the must-fix / should-fix lists have been
> inadvertently forked. We are merging them again, so please don't update
> the wiki until we have worked out what to do with them. This should be a
> day or two at most.
> 
> I had the idea that maybe we could put them into the source tree, and
> encourage people to keep them up to date by making them become criteria
> for the feature and code freeze. Comments?

I'm a little disappointed that after I spent time converting them into
the wiki form, you're now proposing abandoning them again.  This seems
like a retrograde step.

What I'd be more interested in doing is combining the must- and should-
fix lists.  As a first pass, just put all the must-fix items on the
should-fix list at pri 4.  One of the things I did was delete the things
that appeared on both lists.  This would obviously be easier if they
were in one list ;-)

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/