Re: [vserver] Re: sys_vserver

[Chris Wright]

* Herbert Poetzl (herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> hmm, okay I see it now clearly, we should take
> the approach which was so successful for scsi ...
> 
> echo "vserver add-new-vserver 100 0 1 192 0 0 1" >/proc/1/attr/new
> 
> and of course to 'change' the context, a simple
> 
> echo "vserver change-to-old-context 100" >/proc/self/attr/migrate
> (and it was never seen again, because it vanished in context 100)
> 
> will be sufficient ...

Sorry if I don't follow your example correctly.  There is an attr/prev
as well as attr/current, if you are worried the previous context would
be lost.

> seriously I am completely on your side if we talk about
> limiting a process or changing it's environment, even
> if we talk about setting a class assignment, but I just 
> don't believe it's the perfect solution for everything ...

Yes, I agree, it won't be useful for everything, but where
possible/sensible, we should reuse it.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/