Re: Kernel includefile bug not fixed after a year :-(

[Erik Andersen]

On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 10:48:45AM +0200, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > A classic recent example is iproute, which uses kernel headers
> > all over the place.  It compiled with earlier 2.4.x kernels, but
> > it no longer compiles 2.4.22.  I've not bothered to try and fix
> > it, but if it included its own set of sanitized kernel headers,
> > it would not have had a problem.
> 
> And if some IOCTLs were changed in between, in the kernel and
> kernel headers ? 
> You end up with an application that you can compile, but doesn't
> behave as expected ? What a progress :-(

People who change ioctl numbers needs their kneecaps broken.
Regardless, I didn't say I liked the current situation.  I
just said that is the current officially sanctioned method
of dealing with it,

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/