Re: [PATCH] Mutilated form of Andi Kleen's AMD prefetch erratapatch

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 09:53:18 EST


Jamie Lokier <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > What about the 4G+4G split?
>
> Whoever is looking after the 4G+4G patch can deal with it, presumably.
> It'll be the same condition ad 4G+4G uses to decide if it's an access
> to userspace (needing a search of the vma list), or not.

It should "just work". 4G+4G is false advertising:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_4G_VM_LAYOUT
#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0x02000000)
#define TASK_SIZE (0xff000000)
#else

I'm a bit confused as to what significance the faulting address has btw:
kernel code can raise prefetch faults against addresses which are less
than, and presumably greater than TASK_SIZE.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/