[BENCHMARK] reaim 2x,4x,8x with various SMP balancing patches

From: Con Kolivas
Date: Sun Sep 14 2003 - 04:37:55 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

With the help of the OSDL hardware I've thrown a bootload of reaim benchmarks
at these various patches because of the confusion regarding their usefulness.
2.6.0-test5 is the baseline, and the 3 unique patches CMT,A3,BT were added by
themselves and all together to 2.6.0-test5 for comparison. Finally the full
2.6.0-test5-mm1 patch was compared. The A3 patch was modified slightly to
overcome the one minor magnitude error for fairness. Looking at the url for
each benchmark and examining the "Graph - Jobs per minute" is useful to
assess where the performance hovers.


Legend

260t5 - vanilla 2.6.0-test5
CMT - sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch
A3 - sched-2.6.0-test2-mm2-A3.patch
BT - sched-balance-tuning.patch
all - CMT + A3 + BT
mm1 - 2.6.0-test5-mm1


2 CPU:

Kernel Throughput URL
260t5 1337.11 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279474/
CMT 1321.92 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279796/
A3 1304.82 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279799
BT 1326.27 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279802
All 1337.79 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279805/
mm1 1316.95 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279588/


4 CPU:

Kernel Throughput URL
260t5 5406.68 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279883
CMT
A3 5099.14 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279800
BT 5721.79 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279803
All 4919.36 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279806
mm1 5360.32 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279887


8 CPU:

Kernel Throughput URL
260t5 8812.21 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279448/
CMT 8794.14 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279798
A3 7084.15 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279801
BT 8615.13 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279804
All 7629.14 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279919
mm1 8478.10 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/279562/


4xCMT seemed to not successfully finish.

In summary, it appears that all the patches cause detriment to performance,
except the combination of BT with 4 cpus. The A3 patch is particularly
detrimental, but it is reassuring to see that the extra patches in mm1 (which
includes O1int patches) recover a lot of that performance, even with the
other balancing patches.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ZDhtZUg7+tp6mRURAmJAAJ4zMYHg7iSuVHi7SpiS5hkmoaQl9wCggrcB
SSH6dbJthgABVnEIn4K/z3M=
=Jz7G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/