Re: Memory mapped IO vs Port IO

[Jesse Barnes]

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:10:25AM -0700, Anthony Dominic Truong wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MMIO
> >         writel(... )
> >         readl(...)
> > #else
> >         outl( ... ) 
> >         inl ( ...) 
> > #endif
> > 
> > to 
> >         if (dev->mmio) { 
> >                 writel(); 
> >                 real();
> >         } else { 
> >                 outl();
> >                 inl();
> >         } 
> > 
> > and you will have a hard time to benchmark the difference on any non
> > ancient system
> > in actual driver operation.
> > 
> > -Andi
> > 
> Hello,
> Wouldn't it be better if we set the IN and OUT function pointers to the
> right functions during driver init. based on the setting of dev->mmio.
> And throughout the driver, we just call the IN and OUT functions by
> their pointers.  Then we don't have to do if (dev->mmio) every time.
> It's similar to the concept of virtual member function in C++.

I'd rather not see any more pointer dereferences or even branches than
absolutely necessary.  Right now, readX/writeX and inX/outX are usually
inlines, and outX and writeX can be very fast.  So I'd prefer either a
global CONFIG_MMIO option or consistent driver specific options that
explain what the difference between MMIO and port I/O actually is.

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/