Re: [PATCH][2.6] i386 /proc/irq/.../smp_affinity

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> This backs out the variable-length cpu bitmask handling.
> 
> I appear to be printing out 16-bit chunks of all this in what appears
> to be the reverse of the order expected. Why not just reverse the order
> of the 16-bit chunks?

Indeed it does, i was thinking about supported systems and the lack of 
NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG ia32 boxen.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/