Inappropriate signatures

From: Larry McVoy
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 13:09:30 EST


Dear Andrea,

We're providing the service which enables all of the below and without
our good will that service is at risk. You're publicly slamming the
providers of that service.

If you want to do that, that's your right, but that leads us to ask:

- wasn't the deal that we do the gateway and you stop whining?
- why should we provide this gateway service at all if there is whining?
- why shouldn't we firewall you off since you are whining?
- or if firewalling fails, put in a day or two delay in the gateway?

> /*
> * If you refuse to depend on closed software for a critical
> * part of your business, these links may be useful:
> *
> * rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5/
> * rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.4/
> * http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
> *
> * svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.6/trunk
> * svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.4/trunk
> */
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/