Re: Priority Inversion in Scheduling

[Mike Galbraith]

At 11:28 AM 9/10/2003, Nick Piggin wrote:

> Sounds interesting. I my scheduler doesn't have any inversion or
> starvation issues that I know of without backboost though. I'd like to
> know if you find any.

I haven't been able to stimulate inversion, or found any terminal 
starvation with your mods.  The only things I can see is array switch 
latency making X choppy under load, and the cpu distribution differences 
shown by contest (and both may have changed considerably since last version 
tested).

        -Mike 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/