Re: Plans for better performance metrics in upcoming kernels?

[Craig Thomas]

We have a project to maintain and improve systat here at OSDL.  We're 
looking for others to help in this area, if your're interested. 

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 07:54, Scott Chapman wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I received one reply to this email.  I take it there is nobody really heading 
> up the implementation of improved/missing performance metrics in the kernel?
> 
> Is this on anyone's radar?
> 
> What is Linus' take on more/better metrics?  
> Is he likely to roll them in if they are implemented?
> 
> Is there any plan to implement any existing patches? 
> 
> If I can get developer time applied to this project, I don't want to re-invent 
> the existing pieces.  Who do I coordinate with?
> 
> Cordially,
> Scott
> 
> On Friday 05 September 2003 16:41, Scott Chapman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm wondering what the plans are for more accurate and more useful
> > performance metrics in upcoming kernels.
> >
> > CPU Utilization by process is apparently a known-inaccuracy.
> >
> > There are no disk I/O metrics per process.
> >
> > CPU Queue Length doesn't appear to be available?
> >
> > Etc.
> >
> > Linux clearly falls behind the competition in this area. It makes it rather
> > tough to do system performance analysis on a Linux box!  :-)
> >
> > Is there a plan to deal with these issues?  ETA's?
> >
> > Cordially,
> > Scott
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- 
Craig Thomas
craiger@xxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/