Re: [PATCH] Re: today's futex changes

From: Jamie Lokier
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 15:10:37 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > D: 4) Andrew Morton says spurious wakeup is a bug. Catch it.
>
> Yes, but going BUG() is a bit rude. We can detect the error, we can
> recover from it and it doesn't cause any user data corruption or anything.
> A rude printk is all that is needed here.

Well, it should really _never_ happen. We are very careful. Is
there something like BUG() which doesn't terminate the process?

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/